This article is so cool and to read it is such an enjoyable moment.
However, I am wondering whether this article can truly be accepted and to be
followed then? Notice that, this article is lack of facts or in other means,
the sources of facts are not clear. I detect a numbers of fallacies made by the
author. As for the first fallacy, it is definitely due to appeal to irrelevant
authority. How great is the author that he can call himself as ‘The Guru of
Cool’ and state “I am adult and I know better”. The readers will surely argue
for the gazette which certified the author’s qualification in commanding people
as being cool or not.
It is great if people can think of two things at a time. But, the author
should not do the fallacy of wild goose chase. This is clearly stated as the
author said, “smoking
might kill you one day”. It should be link to the health of the smoker right? But then, the
author twist the issue of smoking in such an expensive authority as the money
can be used for dating, and to buy clothes. This statement will surely create
unsatisfied emotion among the readers especially the smokers. Cigarettes to
smokers are like live-convincing.
At last, this article is nice to be a reading tool but the readers
should not simply trust the ideas as there are a quite number of fallacies used.
So, with that, take it and learn it.
(250 words)
Izah
No comments:
Post a Comment