Tanya Pakar : 6 Formula Kerjaya Impian
Submitted to : Airil Haimi Mohd Adnan, tutor
In partial requirement for BEL 313, Introduction to Critical Thinking.
Test #2, Semester 1 2013/2014,
Universiti Teknologi MARA, Seri Iskandar Campus,
Perak Darul Ridzuan.
Submitted by : Norsyahizah binti Zulkifli, UiTM #2011225582
This article makes sense and
is successful in acknowledging the readers. In fact, almost every single idea,
is followed by a study. It is quite tricky because the author is very clever to
hide a number of fallacies. Therefore, the readers need to use a neat reading
skills to recognize the fallacy that is made by the author. As for the first
fallacy that I want to share vigorously is an appeal to tradition as the author
state “mereka yang bergelar graduan tentu mengharapakan tawaran kerja sebaik
tamat pengajian”. The question is that, are all post-graduates are really in
need for jobs just after the studies?
Furthermore, there is a fallacy of the camel’s nose as the author said
that, “tidak yakin berkomunikasi dalam bahasa Inggeris” will influence to
the failure in an interview. In fact, every post-graduate should have a
technical and soft skill especially in twisting the hot environment of the
interview. These skills are surely at utmost requirement as they show the
credibility of the post-graduates in handling the tasks. The article also has a type of fallacy of ad
populum in which the author state ”buktinya, ada graduan yang sudah berjaya
kerana mereka ‘lebih dari layak’ berdasarkan semua criteria di dalam rajah
FKI”. It is simply said that the author uses the common people’s beliefs to
influence post-graduates.
In spite of having quite a number of fallacies, this article is a good sense
to make the readers know the level of achievement in their future career.
(250 words)
Izah
No comments:
Post a Comment