This
article makes sense and is successful in acknowledging the readers. In fact,
almost every single idea, is followed by a study. It is quite tricky because
the author is very clever to hide a number of fallacies. Therefore, the readers
need to use a neat reading skills to recognise the fallacy that is made by the author.
As for the first fallacy that I want to share vigorously is appeal to tradition
as the author state “mereka yang bergelar graduan tentu mengharapakan tawaran
kerja sebaik tamat pengajian”. The question is that, are all post-graduates are
really in need for jobs just after the studies?
Furthermore,
there is a fallacy of the camel’s nose as the author said that, “ tidak yakin
berkomunikasi dalam bahasa Inggeris”
will influence to the failure in interview. In fact, every
post-graduates should have a technical and soft skills especially in twisting
the hot environment of the interview. These skills are surely at utmost
requirement as they show the credibility of the post-graduates in handling the
tasks. The article
also has a type of fallacy of ad populum in which the author state ”buktinya,
ada graduan yang sudah berjaya kerana mereka ‘lebih dari layak’ berdasarkan
semua criteria di dalam rajah FKI”. It is simply said that the author use the common
people’s beliefs to influence post-graduates.
In spite of having quite number of fallacies, this article is a good sensor to make the readers know the level of achievement in their future career and life.
(250 words)
Izah
No comments:
Post a Comment